History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clifford v. Plumer
45 N.H. 269
N.H.
1864
Check Treatment
Bellows, J.

We are of the opinion, that the judgment in this case could not be impeached by the defendant in this proceeding, even if the administrator of Samuel Prescott was erroneously admitted to defend; but the error should have been taken advantage of by proceedings directly instituted for that purpose — either by the summary proceedings of a bill of exceptions, or by writ of error — the latter, however, not being applicable where resort might be had to the former. Nichols v. Smith, *27026 N. H. 298; Peebles v. Rand, 43 N. H. 337; Flanders v. Bank, 43 N. H. 383.

Therefore, as the judgment must be taken to be valid, as the case now stands, there must be

Judgment for the plaintiff .

Case Details

Case Name: Clifford v. Plumer
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 15, 1864
Citation: 45 N.H. 269
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.