History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cleveland v. Eichengreen
205 Ill. App. 300
Ill. App. Ct.
1917
Check Treatment
Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Garnishment—when garnishee is not entitled to retain money pending writ of error. A garnishee in an attachment action has no right after the attachment has been quashed, and an order discharging him as garnishee has been entered, to retain the money during the pendency of a writ of error where no supersedeas was allowed, and he was not a party to the writ of error, and no notice of its issuance had been served upon him, and the writ was never filed with the clerk of the court to which such writ issued. 3. Appeal and error, § 710*—what is effect of supersedeas. A supersedeas suspends the efficacy of a judgment, but does not, like reversal, annul the judgment.

Case Details

Case Name: Cleveland v. Eichengreen
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Apr 16, 1917
Citation: 205 Ill. App. 300
Docket Number: Gen. No. 22,853
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.