76 Ga. 834 | Ga. | 1886
[The Cleveland National Bank brought complaint in the city court of Eloyd county against Mrs. M. R. Reynolds on three promissory notes, made by her to W. T. Williams & Son and endorsed by them. The defendant pleaded the general issue and payment. On the trial, the jury found for the plaintiff. The defendant moved for a new trial, on the ground, among others, that the defendant was providentially kept away from the trial; that her counsel did not know the reason of her absence, and could not, therefore, move for a continuance, and that her presence was necessary and her testimony material.
Attached to the motion was the affidavit of the defend
Counsel for the defendant also made an affidavit that on the trial they were ignorant of the cause of her absence, and could not, therefore, move for a continuance, and that her presence and testimony were necessary to a successful defence of the case.
The court overruled the motion. On exception to the superior court, the presiding judge reversed the ruling of the judge of the city court and granted a new trial. The plaintiff excepted.]