History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clements v. State
39 Ga. App. 554
Ga. Ct. App.
1929
Check Treatment
Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of violating the “labor-contract act” .(Penal Code of 1910, § 915). “The evidence failing to disclose an intent to defraud on the part of the defendant at the time the advances were obtained, the conviction was unauthorized,” and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Raffield v. State, 7 Ga. App. 422 (2) (67 8. E. 109) ; Curry v. State, 7 Ga. App. 582 (67 S. E. 698).

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Ben Smith, for plaintiff in error. H. G. Morgan, solicitor-general, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Clements v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 9, 1929
Citation: 39 Ga. App. 554
Docket Number: 19509
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.