midpage

Clement v. StateClement v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
May 8, 1985
No. 84-1573
Versions:468 So. 2d 467
10 Fla. L. Weekly 1152
1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13876
PER CURIAM.

While we affirm all of the judgment and convictions, we must remand for resentenc-ing. The trial court did not have the benefit of our decision in Boynton v. State, 10 F.L.W. 795 (Fla. 4th DCA March 27, 1985).

Upon resentencing, there can be no retention of jurisdiction, and any departure from the guidelines must be based upon clear and convincing reasons, expressed in writing.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Clement v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 8, 1985
Citations: 468 So. 2d 467; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1152; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13876; No. 84-1573
Docket Number: No. 84-1573
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In