History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clement v. Clement
288 So. 2d 537
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1974
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

One of the points raised on appeal at first gave us pause, but after having carefully considered that point and having meticulously reviewed the record herein, we conclude that no prejudicial error has been made to appear. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

McNULTY, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur. GOODRICH, LAURENCE I., Associate • Judge, dissents.

Case Details

Case Name: Clement v. Clement
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 16, 1974
Citation: 288 So. 2d 537
Docket Number: No. 72-752
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.