midpage

Cleary v. Reliance Fuel Oil Associates, Inc.Cleary v. Reliance Fuel Oil Associates, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals
Nov 17, 2005
Versions:5 N.Y.3d 859
840 N.E.2d 1024
807 N.Y.S.2d 11

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Appellate Division majority that defendants Bock Water Heaters, Inc. and Honeywell, Inc. made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Plaintiffs have failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to defendants’ motions.

*861 Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: Cleary v. Reliance Fuel Oil Associates, Inc.
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 17, 2005
Citations: 5 N.Y.3d 859; 840 N.E.2d 1024; 807 N.Y.S.2d 11
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In