History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cleary v. Reliance Fuel Oil Associates, Inc.
5 N.Y.3d 859
| NY | 2005
|
Check Treatment
5 N.Y.3d 859 (2005)
840 N.E.2d 1024
807 N.Y.S.2d 11

NIKI MARIE CLEARY et al., Appellants,
v.
RELIANCE FUEL OIL ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided November 17, 2005.

*860 Kujawski & Dellicarpini, Deer Park (Bryan P. Kujawski of counsel), for appellants.

L'Abbate, Balkan, Colavita & Contini, L.L.P., New York City (Tomas B. Lim of counsel), for Bock Water Heaters, Inc., respondent.

Flynn, Gaskins & Bennett, Minneapolis, Minnesota (George W. Flynn of counsel), for Honeywell International Inc., respondent.

Before: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges G.B. SMITH, CIPARICK, ROSENBLATT, GRAFFEO, READ and R.S. SMITH concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Appellate Division majority that defendants Bock Water Heaters, Inc. and Honeywell, Inc. made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. Plaintiffs have failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to defendants' motions.

*861 On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: Cleary v. Reliance Fuel Oil Associates, Inc.
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 17, 2005
Citation: 5 N.Y.3d 859
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.