History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cleary Bros. Construction Co. v. Lanier
206 So. 2d 385
Fla.
1968
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 19, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is granted in the- sum of $250.00.

CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Cleary Bros. Construction Co. v. Lanier
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Jan 31, 1968
Citation: 206 So. 2d 385
Docket Number: No. 36532
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.