History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cleaden v. Yeates
5 Whart. 94
Pa.
1840
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Neither the sum for which suit was brought, the matter in controversy, nor the amount for which judgment was given, is beyond the appellate jurisdiction of the Common Pleas. It never has been doubted, that a plaintiff may reduce his demand to the standard of a limited jurisdiction, by lopping off the excess; and it is not pretended that more, if so much, was done here.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Cleaden v. Yeates
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 4, 1840
Citation: 5 Whart. 94
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.