History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clayton v. Per Dun
13 Johns. 218
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1816
Check Treatment
Per Curiam*

The evidence clearly shows, that the justice kept a tavern in fact; aqd whether he had, or had not,, a license for. that purpose, he Was equally disqualified for trying causes as a justice.- Nof is It material .that the suit was instituted before he became, so disqualified;. nor would it cure the defect if .the, plaintiff below did áppéar and consent, to the trial, becaiise such consent .could not confer jurisdictioft. Low v. Rice,, (8 Johns. Rep. 409.,) on the-two; last points, is.decisive.

The. judgment must, be reversed*

Case Details

Case Name: Clayton v. Per Dun
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1816
Citation: 13 Johns. 218
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.