History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clay v. City of East Orange
91 N.J. 429
| N.J. | 1982
|
Check Treatment
91 N.J. 429 (1982)
452 A.2d 1323

ARTHUR L. CLAY, DAVID SCHULMAN (DAVAL ASSOCIATES) AND ALAN SCHULMAN (PROGRESSIVE REALTY MANAGEMENT CO.), DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF EAST ORANGE, PHILIP T. MORRIS, VIRGINIA WHITE AND GUS ELMORE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 22, 1982.
Decided December 6, 1982.

H. Neil Broder argued the cause for appellants (Brach, Eichler, Rosenberg, Silver, Bernstein & Hammer, attorneys; H. Neil Broder and Michael L. Ostrowsky, on the brief).

Ernest R. Booker, First Assistant City Counsel, argued the cause for respondents (William H. Eaton, City Counsel, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, 181 N.J. Super. 40, is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Superior Court, Law Division, Essex County, which opinion is reported at 177 N.J. Super. 79 (Law Div. 1980).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN and GARIBALDI — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Clay v. City of East Orange
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Dec 6, 1982
Citation: 91 N.J. 429
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.