50 Ga. App. 398 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1935
1. “Intent being one of the essential elements of the crime charged in an indictment for larceny after trust, evidence relating to other similar transactions is admissible, under the exceptions to the general rule, where it tends to prove intent.” Maynard v. State, 47 Ga. App. 221 (170 S. E. 265). In the instant ease the charge on similar transactions was authorized by the evidence and was not error for any reason assigned.
2. Under the facts of the case the court did not err in refusing the following request to charge: “Now comes the defendant and respectfully re
3. The verdict was amply supported by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error for any reason assigned.
Judgment affirmed.