Claron v. Thommessen

94 N.J. Eq. 530 | N.J. | 1923

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll.

■For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Tbeyciiaed, Beegeh, MIjSTTUEN, Kalisoh, Black, Katzeybaci-i, White, Williams, Gabdneb-—11.

For reversal—Rone.

midpage