72 So. 291 | Ala. Ct. App. | 1916
The substitution was a distinction without a substantial difference; it was a substantial conformity, which is sufficient.— Block v. State, 66 Ala. 493; Richmond v. State, 4 Ala. App. 129, 58 South. 973.
There being no reversible error in the record, the judgment of the court below is accordingly affirmed.
Affirmed.