History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clark v. State
22 Ga. App. 125
Ga. Ct. App.
1918
Check Treatment
Harwell, J.

The plaintiff in error was indicted for stealing a cow belonging to the farm of Jackson Brothers. The State’s evidence showed that the cow described in the indictment was missing, and was found in the possession of one McDaniel; and he testified that he bought the cow from one Bozeman. Bozeman testified that he (Bozeman) bought the cow from the defendant, and gave him $10 for her. The defendant made no statement in explanation of his possession. The_only ’ witness introduced by the defendant testified that the cow that he saw the defendant put in Bozeman’s pasture was of a description different from that given in the indictment. The motion for a new trial was based upon the general' grounds only. It is not necessary to add anything further to the headnote.

Judgment affirmed.

'Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Clark v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 2, 1918
Citation: 22 Ga. App. 125
Docket Number: 9507
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.