History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clark v. State
2017 ND 238
| N.D. | 2017
|
Check Treatment

Filed 10/17/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2017 ND 238

Joshua Clark, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20170076

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce B. Haskell, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, N.D., for petitioner and appellant.

Marina Spahr, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, N.D., for respondent and appellee.

Clark v. State

No. 20170076

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Joshua Clark appeals from a district court’s judgment summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief.  On appeal, Clark argues the district court erred by dismissing his application without holding an evidentiary hearing.  Because Clark was put to his proof and did not meet his minimal burden of supporting his application with competent, admissible evidence raising an issue of material fact, we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).   See, e.g. , Ude v. State , 2009 ND 71, ¶ 12, 764 N.W.2d 419 (affirming the summary dismissal of a post-conviction application when the petitioner was put to his proof and failed to present any competent evidence raising an issue of material fact).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen

Case Details

Case Name: Clark v. State
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 17, 2017
Citation: 2017 ND 238
Docket Number: 20170076
Court Abbreviation: N.D.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.