History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clark v. State
57 S.W. 847
Tex. Crim. App.
1900
Check Treatment

Appellant was convicted in the county court of theft, and his punishment assessed at ten days confinement in the county jail and a fine of $25. Motion is made by the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss the appeal because the recognizance fails to state the punishment as required by the statute. The recognizance states the punishment to be a fine of $25, omitting the ten days imprisonment in the county jail. The statute requires that the punishment assessed by the jury shall be stated in the recognizance, and, as this has not been done, that instrument is fatally defective, and the motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Dismissed.

HENDERSON, Judge, absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Clark v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Apr 11, 1900
Citation: 57 S.W. 847
Docket Number: No. 1893.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.