History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clark v. . Riddle
118 N.C. 692
N.C.
1896
Check Treatment

The defendant appealed from the judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and in this Court moved that a new trial be ordered for newly discovered testimony. In the exercise of the discretionary power vested in the Court it is ordered that a new trial be granted on account of newly discovered evidence. Such orders are made in this Court, as in the court below, for no other reason than that we think the ends of justice will be best subserved by taking that course, and are never, therefore, to be treated as precedents. Sledge v. Elliott, 116 N.C. 712; Brown v. Mitchell,102 N.C. 347.

New Trial.

Cited: Nathan v. R. R., post, 1070; Herndon v. R. R., 121 N.C. 499;Chrisco v. Yow, 153 N.C. 436. *Page 431 (693)

Case Details

Case Name: Clark v. . Riddle
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Feb 5, 1896
Citation: 118 N.C. 692
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.