Clark v. Pine Hill Homes, Inc.Clark v. Pine Hill Homes, Inc.
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The trial court properly found Pine Hill Homes, Inc. and Floyd Reynolds jointly and severely liable for their failure to construct plaintiffs home in a workmanlike manner. This was not, as Reynolds contends, an action for breach of contract. Plaintiffs case was pleaded and tried on the theory that Reynolds was negligent in the performance and supervision of the work of constructing plaintiffs home and that his negligence resulted in unworkmanlike construction for which he should be held personally liable. The general rule is that an officer of a corporation who participates in the commission of a tort by the corporation is personally liable therefor. A corporate officer is not held liable for the negligence of the corporation merely because of his official relationship to it. It must be shown that the officer was a participant in the wrongful conduct (Matter of State of New York v Daro Chartours,