midpage

Clark v. PhelpsClark v. Phelps

New York Court of Chancery
Aug 1, 1822
Reporters:
, ,

The Chancellor said, that the answer and the demurrer each ‍‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‍went to the whole bill; and it is a settled rule in pleading, that a defendant cannot plead or ‍‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‍answer, and demur to the same matter; the former will overrule the latter. It is inconsistent for a defendant ‍‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‍to say, he ought not to answer to a bill; and yet to answer it fully. The rule appears ‍‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‍in all the books that treat on the subject. (3 P. Wms. 80, 81. 2 Atk. 284. Cooler’s Tr. of Pl. 113. Beames’ Plead. 40.) The demurrer ‍‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‍was consequently overruled, and^the question of costs reserved.

Order accordingly. -

Case Details

Case Name: Clark v. Phelps
Court Name: New York Court of Chancery
Date Published: Aug 1, 1822
Citations: 6 Johns. Ch. 214; 1822 N.Y. LEXIS 179; 1822 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 44
Log In