History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clark v. Phelps
6 Johns. Ch. 214
New York Court of Chancery
1822
Check Treatment

The Chancellor said, that the answer and the demurrer each went to the whole bill; and it is a settled rule in pleading, that a defendant cannot plead or answer, and demur to the same matter; the former will overrule the latter. It is inconsistent for a defendant to say, he ought not to answer to a bill; and yet to answer it fully. The rule appears in all the books that treat on the subject. (3 P. Wms. 80, 81. 2 Atk. 284. Cooler’s Tr. of Pl. 113. Beames' Plead. 40.) The demurrer was consequently overruled, and^the question of costs reserved.

Order accordingly. -

Case Details

Case Name: Clark v. Phelps
Court Name: New York Court of Chancery
Date Published: Aug 1, 1822
Citation: 6 Johns. Ch. 214
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.