History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clark v. Lowe
113 Mich. 352
Mich.
1897
Check Treatment
Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). The defendant contends that the agreement was set forth in the deed, and that this agreement cannot be varied by parol. We think the case is ruled by Bowker v. Johnson, 17 Mich. 42, and Ford v. Savage, 111 Mich. 144.

The judgment is affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Clark v. Lowe
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 7, 1897
Citation: 113 Mich. 352
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.