Clark v. Lowe
113 Mich. 352
Mich.1897Check Treatment(after stating the facts). The defendant contends that the agreement was set forth in the deed, and that this agreement cannot be varied by parol. We think the case is ruled by Bowker v. Johnson, 17 Mich. 42, and Ford v. Savage, 111 Mich. 144.
The judgment is affirmed.
