History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clark v. Kellar
66 Ky. 223
Ky. Ct. App.
1867
Check Treatment
JUDGE WILLIAMS

delivered the opinion of the court:

It being about five years after the last process and return of not found until another process was sued out and executed, and Kellar residing all this time in the city of Louisville, where he resided when the account for merchandise was created, authorized the special find*224ing of the jury that the suit had not, in good faith, been prosecuted. To prevent the statute of limitations from running, a suit must be brought and prosecuted in good faith; and, if the time constituting the bar is permitted to elapse between the suing out of one process until another, the mere bringing the suit will not prevent the statute from running, and is no legal reason why the bar should be disallowed.

The court properly refused to render judgment in favor of appellant on this special verdict, although the jury also found that the account was proved, and that the balance, as charged, had never been paid, and properly dismissed the action.- ,-

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Clark v. Kellar
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Date Published: Feb 7, 1867
Citation: 66 Ky. 223
Court Abbreviation: Ky. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.