midpage

Clark v. JenkinsClark v. Jenkins

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Oct 15, 1827
Versions:22 Mass. 280
Per Curiam.

We think .that as the assignment was not recorded, it is a question for the jury to determine whether the demandant had notice. The deduction made by counsel from the deed of the equity of redemption, is one which might not be made by common minds, but it may be thought by a jury that the demandant is a man of more than ordinary acuteness and so had notice. The action will stand for trial.

Case Details

Case Name: Clark v. Jenkins
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1827
Citation: 22 Mass. 280
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
Log In