History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clark v. Cochran
77 Fla. 98
Fla.
1919
Check Treatment
Ellis, J.

— Writ of error to the judgment of the Circuit Court for Franklin County in an action of ejectment brought by the plaintiffs in error against the defendants in error.

The certificate of the clerk to the transcript of record is defective in that it fails to state that the transcript contains “a correct transcript of the record of the judgment” in the case; nor does the certificate state that the transcript contains “a true and correct recital and copy of all such papers and proceedings in said cause as appears upon the records and files” of the clerk’s office “that have been directed to be included in said transcript by the written demands of the said parties.” See Special Rule 3, Rules of Circuit Courts; also Rule 103.

The writ of error is dismissed upon the authority of the above rules and the following decisions of this court: Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. Lewallen, 56 Fla. 306, 47 South. Rep. 795; Keen v. State ex rel. Drane, 56 Fla. 241, 47 South. Rep. 924; Burnham v. Driggers, 44 Fla. 168, 32 South. Rep. 796; First Nat. Bank of Pensacola v. Oxford Lake Line, 45 Fla. 275, 34 South. Rep. 893; Dees v. Cassels, 54 Fla. 485, 44 South. Rep. 1013; Ramsey v. Wells, 36 Fla. 88, 18 South. Rep. 181; Merchants’ Nat. Bank of Jacksonville v. Grunthal, 38 Fla. 93, 20 South. Rep. 809; McRainey v. Jarrell, 59 Fla. 585, 52 South. Rep. 10.

The cause may be reinstated upon compliance with the terms of Chapter 5898, Laws of 1909, Sec. 1705a, Florida Compiled Laws, 1914.

Dismissed.

*100Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Whitfield and West, J. J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Clark v. Cochran
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Jan 24, 1919
Citation: 77 Fla. 98
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.