History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clark v. Brown
1 Root 77
Conn. Super. Ct.
1777
Check Treatment

Judgment of the Superior Court — That there is nothing erroneous in the judgment complained of. Eor first, the defendant cannot take advantage of the statute upon a general demurrer, for the plaintiff may have a written note or memorandum of th°e promise, which he might produce in evidence. 2d. This action is not brought on the parol agreement only, but upon an agreement executed on one part; and so is not within the statute. Gilbert Court of Chancery, 231; 1 Bacon Ab. 74, and 75; 2 Str. 783; 1 Blac. Reports, 600.

Case Details

Case Name: Clark v. Brown
Court Name: Connecticut Superior Court
Date Published: Dec 15, 1777
Citation: 1 Root 77
Court Abbreviation: Conn. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.