*1 589 preserves injunction merely the The litigation. pending property the temporary status of the v. OGDEN. et al. CLARICE granting in a In such cases junction of the 2525. No. largely discretion in the sound rests Appeals Land El Paso. Paso Texas. v. El of trial court. Crawford of of the Civil Court 256; App.) Imp. (Tex. 192 S. W. Civ. Co. 6, Nov. 1930. App.) (Tex. 300 S. W. Merrell v. Moore Civ. 4, Rehearing Dec. 1930. Granted City (Tex. ; v. of Winnsboro 953 Sutherland App.) 225 W. 63. Civ. S. propriety of the We are doubtful of the granting in in writ this court’s action the declining in the motion to case and to sustain say dissolve, prepared but are to that we not there was an abuse of the discretion vested in peti- of the such The verification eases. Co. v. Davis Oil tion sufficient. Houston was 337; Simpson (Tex. App.) v. Civ. 154 S. W. Civ; App.) (Tex. McGuirk 194 979. S.W. propositions appellants’ in Other submitted regarded brief have been considered and are showing as no reversible error. Affirmed. Rehearing. On appeal In this the action of the lower eorrgct doubt as to court was affirmed with ruling. Upon ness of our consideration of the rehearing, motion the -conclusion is for doing. reached that erred in so we undertaking plead- Without to state the ings detail, say in it is to that sufficient appellee sued to establish and a foreclose upon in lien recover the title It lots and the alternative to two possession and of the lots. pos- alleged in was the defendants were threatening place im- certain session and provements upon to plaintiff lots which did the thereon, placed thereof and the cost not wish might charges against and liens the become lots. as In state of the title to the lots dis- the by pleadings, defendants closed the could upon fix liens the lots for the cost of the not improvements, and it does threatened not Dunaway Lee, Midland, appellants. & of for improvements appear such would dam- that age property. equitable, We thinÉ no the Yonge, M. and Charles both of J. Caldwell ground for is shown the of issuance the writ appellee. Midland, for injunction of should have and the motion to dissolve been sustained. HIGGINS, J. Reversed, judgment and rendered here dis- appeal from an order overrul- is an This injunction. solving the injunc- temporary ing to dissolve a motion a rendered. Reversed and tion.