History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clarence McGuffin v. Nancy Berryhill
697 F. App'x 247
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before KEENAN, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Andrew McGuffin, Appellant Pro Se. Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Andrew McGuffin appeals the district court’s order granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss McGuffin’s complaint as untimely filed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McGuffin v. Berryhill , No. 5:16-cv-00467-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Clarence McGuffin v. Nancy Berryhill
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 26, 2017
Citation: 697 F. App'x 247
Docket Number: 17-1288
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.