History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clarence Farmer v. United States
341 F.2d 411
D.C. Cir.
1964
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of housebreaking and petit larceny. His counsel, appointed by this court, urges two grounds for reversal, (1) that two oral confessions made by appellant were involuntary, 1 and (2) the confessions were not corroborated. Upon consideration of the testimony as to the circumstances in which the confessions were made, and the evidence bearing on the issue of corroboration, we can accept neither ground as a basis for reversal.

Affirmed.

Notes

1

. One of the confessions was made to an officer in a telephone conversation prior to arrest. The other was made to the same officer at about the time of arrest of appellant at the apartment of a friend. Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449, 77 S.Ct. 1356, 1 L.Ed.2d 1479 (1957), accordingly has no application

Case Details

Case Name: Clarence Farmer v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Dec 31, 1964
Citation: 341 F.2d 411
Docket Number: 18791_1
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In