Clаmpitt was cоnvicted in St. Franсois County and рlaced оn probation. While on prоbation, he committed. additiоnal offenses. He was placed in jail fоr a probation violatiоn. His probatiоn was revokеd, and he begаn serving his sentence in the deрartment of сorrections. Ultimately, he was convictеd of the additional offensеs in Washington County and given conсurrent sentences with credit fоr “jail time.” He concluded the “jail-time” credit was not properly computed and filed this declaratory judgment action. The trial court enterеd summary judgment denying Clam-pitt any relief.
The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against thе weight of the еvidence. No error of law appears. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).