midpage

Claim of Weygant v. Walter Kroll, Inc.Claim of Weygant v. Walter Kroll, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Sep 20, 2001
Versions:286 A.D.2d 818
730 N.Y.S.2d 262
2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8635

—Carpinello, J. Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 19, 2000, which ruled that the Workers’ Compensation Law Judge properly exercised his discretion in directing depositions of medical witnesses.

Here, as in Matter of Bathrick v New York State Dept. of Transp. (278 AD2d 704), the appeal has been rendered moot as a result of the rescission by the full Workers’ Compensation Board of the Board panel decision on appeal and we find no exception to the mootness doctrine (see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Claim of Weygant v. Walter Kroll, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Sep 20, 2001
Citations: 286 A.D.2d 818; 730 N.Y.S.2d 262; 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8635
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In