Claim of Pappas v. State University of New YorkClaim of Pappas v. State University of New York
Stein, J. Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed August 31, 2006, which ruled that claimant did not sustain a causally related injury and denied his claim for workers’ compensation benefits.
Claimant
Where, as here, a claimant satisfies his or her initial burden of demonstrating a causal relationship between the job performed and the disability suffered, there is a rebuttable presumption that an unexplained or unwitnessed accident arose out of and in the course of the claimant‘s employment (see
Here, the record reveals numerous inconsistencies. For example, claimant indicated on the accident report that he notified his supervisor of the accident, but then testified that he probably notified his coworkers instead, despite knowing that they had no supervisory control over him. In contrast, one of claimant‘s coworkers testified that he did not recall claimant ever indicating that he had hurt his neck or arm while working for the employer. Claimant also testified that he notified his crew supervisor, John Freer, that he had been hurt, but Freer testified that claimant never told him that he had a problem with his neck or arm. Finally, another supervisor, John Masi, testified that claimant told him that he had the flu, that his arm and neck pain was an ongoing problem and that he had not been injured at work. On the other hand, claimant denied stating that he had the flu or that he was not injured at work. There are also significant discrepancies in the record regarding the cause of claimant‘s injuries.
Spain, J.P., Lahtinen, Kane and Malone Jr., JJ., concur.
Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.