History
  • No items yet
midpage
Claiborne, Sr. v. Singh Gujral
3:17-cv-00289
E.D. Va.
Jun 22, 2017
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT L ~- FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ~I ~ ~ Richmond Division 2 2 20!7 •,I TYEL LASHAWN CLAIBORNE, I'/ i· \ I I L.--·--· CLERK. U.S. D1STn1CT COURT Plaintiff, RICHMOND, VA .,.! v. Civil Action No. 3:17CV289 INDER JEET SINGH GUJRAL,

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order entered on May 10, 2 01 7, the Court conditionally docketed the action. At that time, the Court directed Tyel Lashawn Claiborne to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to the collection of fees form. The Court warned Claiborne that a failure to comply with the above directive within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action.

Claiborne has not complied with the order of this Court. Claiborne failed to return the consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for in forma pauper is status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914 {a). Such conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. p. 41 (b) . Accordingly, this action will be dismissed without prejudice.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of the Memorandum Opinion to Claiborne.

/s/ m

Robert E. Payne

Senior United States District Judge Date: ~A~nJ.l 1~t>l7

Richmond,v~ginia

2

Case Details

Case Name: Claiborne, Sr. v. Singh Gujral
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Virginia
Date Published: Jun 22, 2017
Docket Number: 3:17-cv-00289
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Va.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.