87 F. 795 | U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut | 1898
The parties herein were at issue in an action at law for damages for alleged breach of contract, which
This case presents the question whether, all the alleged breaches having occurred at the commencement of the first action, but recovery for some of them being then prevented by a temporary bar, the plaintiff should have included said breaches in said original action, provided said bar was removed after the action was brought, but before trial, and whether, having failed to do so, his right of action therefor is barred by the former judgment. The exhaustive briefs of counsel fail to show any decision of this question. It is thought that this case falls within the general rule that a party cannot thus split up his causes of action. The cause of action was defendant’s breach of an agreement to indemnify plaintiff against all damages by reason of electrical defects in machines made by defendant for plaintiff, and sold by plaintiff to outside parties. At the time of trial of the former action proof could have been made under an amendment to the complaint of all the damages claimed by reason of said breach. Under the provisions of section 1050, Gen. St. Conn., damages accruing from the same cause of action subsequent to the bringing of the suit may be recovered therein. The demurrer is sustained.