| Mo. Ct. App. | Nov 21, 1893
Under the constitutional amendment, establishing and limiting the appellate jurisdiction of this court, the supreme court has exclusive appellate jurisdiction of any cause wherein a political subdivision of the state is a party. The city of St. Louis is a political subdivision of the state, and, as it is the substantial party in the present action, we think that the appeal was improvidently taken to this court. City of St. Louis v. Bowler, 94 Mo. 630" date_filed="1887-10-15" court="Mo." case_name="City of St. Louis v. Bowler">94 Mo. 630; Freeman v. St. Louis Quarry Co., 30 Mo. App. 362" date_filed="1888-04-10" court="Mo. Ct. App." case_name="Freeman v. St. Louis Quarry Co.">30 Mo. App. 362; Harman v. City of St. Louis, ante, p. 175. The case of City of St. Louis v. Bowler, supra, like the present case, was a suit to recover the penalty or fine for the alleged violation of a city ordinance. It was transferred by this court under a general order as required by the last constitutional amendment defining and regulating the jurisdiction of this court. An order will, therefore, be entered transferring this cause to the supreme court, and that the clerk of this court transmit the record with a copy of this order of transfer to the clerk of that court.