No. 201 | SCOTUS | Mar 27, 1922

Per Curiam.

Dismissed upon the

authority of Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U.S. 161" date_filed="1907-11-18" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh">207 U. S. 161, 178; Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U.S. 394" date_filed="1919-06-09" court="SCOTUS" case_name="City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co.">250 U. S. 394; Kansas City v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 250 U. S. 652; Hillsboro v. Public Service Commission of Oregon, point (3), 255 U.S. 562" date_filed="1921-03-07" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Van Tine v. Moncravie">255 U. S. 562; Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U.S. 609" date_filed="1921-10-05" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Oklahoma v. Texas">257 U. S. 609; Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., 257 U.S. 617" date_filed="1921-11-21" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Watts v. Arizona ex rel. Burgoon">257 U. S. 617; Avon v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U.S. 618" date_filed="1921-12-12" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Township of Avon v. Detroit United Railway">257 U. S. 618; Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Ry. Co., ante, 604.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.