City of Rome v. Ragan
86 S.E. 59
Ga. Ct. App.
1915
Check Treatment
Wade, J.

1. There was evidence supporting the verdict.

2. It does not appear from either of the two grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial that the cause of the movant was sufficiently prejudiced to have required the grant of a new trial; and the rulings of the court are not, for the reasons stated, erroneous.

Judgment affirmed.