City of Rome v. Ragan
86 S.E. 59
| Ga. Ct. App. | 1915
Wade, J.

1. There was evidence supporting the verdict.

2. It does not appear from either of the two grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial that the cause of the movant was sufficiently prejudiced to have required the grant of a new trial; and the rulings of the court are not, for the reasons stated, erroneous.

Judgment affirmed.