M.A., Respondent v. M.G., Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
June 17, 2016.
139 A.3d 1256
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue presented by petitioner and rephrased for clarity is whether it is within the province of a trial court to diagnose a litigant with mental illness when the record is devoid of any diagnosis by a mental health professional or testimony by a mental health professional to support the diagnosis?
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Respondent v. FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT PITT LODGE NO. 1, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
June 20, 2016.
139 A.3d 1257
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:
- Whether a home rule municipality may amend its home rule charter to eliminate mandatory subjects of bargaining as defined by Act 111 of 1968, the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Act and applicable case law?
- Whether a municipality‘s home rule charter provision eliminating a mandatory subject of bargaining for its police officers is pre-empted by Act 111 of 1968?
Darryl BOGGS, Petitioner v. Trevor WINGARD, Respondent.
No. 62 EM 2016.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
June 20, 2016.
139 A.3d 1257
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.