midpage

City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta (ORDER)City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta (ORDER)

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Feb 7, 2018
15-1158
Versions:

John E. Putnam, Peter J. Kirsch, Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP, Denver, CO, for Petitioner (Case No. 15-1158).

Matthew G. Adams, Esquire, Attorney, Dentons US LLP, San Francisco, CA, Peter Lawrence Gray, Attorney, Dentons US LLP, Washington, DC, for Petitioners (Case No. 15-1247).

Lane N. McFadden, Esquire, Attorney, John Charles Cruden, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Environment and Natural Resources Division, Washington, DC, for Respondents.

BEFORE: Rogers and Griffith, Circuit Judges; Sentelle, Senior Circuit Judge

Per Curiam

ORDER

Upon consideration of the joint petition for panel rehearing, it is

ORDERED that the opinion issued August 29, 2017, be amended as follows:

Slip Op., p. 20, Part IV, line 3, insert the word “departure” before the word “routes” and delete the words “and procedures“. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the court issued August 29, 2017, be vacated. The Clerk is directed to issue a new judgment. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate until June 15, 2018, unless the parties notify the court prior to that date that the mandate should issue.

Case Details

Case Name: City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta (ORDER)
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Feb 7, 2018
Citations: 881 F.3d 932; 15-1158
Docket Number: 15-1158
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
Log In
    City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta (ORDER), 881 F.3d 932