midpage

City of New York v. SimmondsCity of New York v. Simmonds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 26, 1991
Versions:172 A.D.2d 1081

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendants’ motion to vacate the default judgment entered against them. The default cannot be considered "excusable” as required by CPLR 5015 (a) (1). Defendants were given a trial date and a five-month adjournment to obtain counsel. They were fully aware that they had to return to court on that date for trial, whether or not they had an attorney to represent them. The court’s directives were neither ambiguous nor confusing, as argued by defendants. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Kings County, Spodek, J.—Vacate Judgment.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Lowery, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: City of New York v. Simmonds
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 26, 1991
Citation: 172 A.D.2d 1081
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In