History
  • No items yet
midpage
125 N.E.3d 636
Ind. Ct. App.
2019

Lead Opinion

Bailey, J., concurs.

Brown, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion.






Concurrence in Part

Brown, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part.

[16] I concur with the majority's conclusion in Part II that the County may still exercise its option to purchase the Center pursuant to the 1992 Lease. However, I respectfully disagree with Part I of the opinion, do not find Ind. Code §§ 36-9-13-22(a)(6) and 36-1-11-8 to be in irreconcilable conflict, and would find that in this instance the County should be able to rely on the authority granted in Ind. Code § 36-1-11-8. Further, Ind. Code § 36-1-11-8 contemplates a transfer or exchange of property made specifically to "a governmental entity," a condition which is not present in Ind. Code § 36-9-13-22(a)(6).

[17] For these reasons I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part.

Case Details

Case Name: City of New Albany v. Bd. of Commissioners of the Cnty. of Floyd
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 22, 2019
Citations: 125 N.E.3d 636; Court of Appeals Case No. 18A-MI-1627
Docket Number: Court of Appeals Case No. 18A-MI-1627
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    City of New Albany v. Bd. of Commissioners of the Cnty. of Floyd, 125 N.E.3d 636