The judgment under review, in this case, is reversed, for the reasons stated in Town of West Orange et al. v. State Board ofTax Appeals, 115 N.J.L. 396; 180 Atl. Rep. 770, and affirmed by this court in 116 N.J.L. 414.
For affirmance — None.
For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, LLOYD, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 12. *Page 507
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
