99 Ky. 292 | Ky. Ct. App. | 1896
delivered the opinion of the court.
This appeal is prosecuted by the city of Hawesville from a judgment rendered in the action of the board of education of Hawesville against the appellant.
The case was submitted upon an agreed statement of facts, and the court rendered judgment in favor of appellee for $638, and from that judgment this appeal is prosecuted, that sum being eighty per cent, of the license fees collected. Appellee obtained a cross-appeal, and insists that the entire license fees should be paid to it, assuming and contending that the act of 1888 setting apart the twenty per cent, for city purposes, being a change of the former law, was and is void.
The contention of appellee is that by the charter of appellee and acts of the Legislature it acquired a vested right to all such license fees, and relies on the Dartmouth College and many other decisions to support its contention. It also contends that the act of 1893 for the government of towns
It seems clear to us that the act of July 3, 1893, repealed all laws inconsistent with it, and the several local acts relied on by appellees, being inconsistent with the general law of 1893, were repealed thereby. Subsection 4 of section 3637, Kentucky Statutes, authorizes the city council to license vendors of spirituous liquor, ar.d requires not less than '$250 nor more than $1,000 license fee to be paid.
Section 3646 supra provides that all moneys received from licenses shall beipaid into the general fund.
It seems clear to us that, under the law in force from and after July 3, 1893, all license fees imposed and collected under the authority of the city council properly belong to the general fund of the city of Hawesville, and the license collected and required to be paid to the State authorities should be paid to the proper officer authorized to receive the same.
For the reasons indicated the judgment on the cross appeal is affirmed, and the judgment on the original appeal is reversed and cause remanded, with directions to render judgment in favor of appellant on its counterclaim and for proceedings consistent with this opinion.