29 Colo. 77 | Colo. | 1901
delivered the opinion of the court.
The first item of plaintiff’s account is for the service of sixty-three notices to build sidewalks, which, be claims to be reasonably worth the sum of $15.75.
The remaining items of plaintiff’s bill are as follows: Three days over-seeing work at Junction Creek bridge, $6.00; crossing on Sixth Street, 17 days, $27.20; grading to water works, 6 days, $12.00.
The ordinances of the city provide that whenever more than three men are employed in the performance of work under the direction of the street supervisor, he shall give his entire time and attention to the supervision of such work, and in addition to his annual salary, shall receive the sum of $2.00 for each day so employed. According to the testimony he is not in a position to take advantage of this provision.
From the evidence of plaintiff and that introduced on behalf of the city, it appears without dispute that plaintiff gave no attention whatever to over-seeing the work mentioned in the above items. On the contrary, he says he was not present when the work at Junction Creek bridge was doné, or when the grading to water works was being performed; that he knew nothing about this work, but that no one forbid him from over-seeing these jobs. He
The judgment of the county court is reversed, and the cau,se remanded, with directions to enter judgment in favor of the city.
Reversed and Remanded,