City of Corning v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
108 N.E. 1091 | NY | 1915
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion. *645
Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, CHASE, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN and MILLER, JJ. Dissenting: SEABURY, J., on the ground that the entire structure between the two stone abutments constituted the framework of the bridge within the meaning of the statute.