History
  • No items yet
midpage
City of Bertram, Texas v. Vicki Reinhardt
03-14-00296-CV
| Tex. App. | Aug 27, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*0 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/27/2015 3:44:58 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk No. 03-14-00296-CV THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 8/27/2015 3:44:58 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE AUSTIN, TEXAS 03-14-00296-CV *1 ACCEPTED [6687057] CLERK IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AT AUSTIN, TEXAS ______________________________________________________

CITY OF BERTRAM, TEXAS Appellant vs.

VICKI REINHARDT Appellee ______________________________________________________

APPELLANT’S FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT:

NOW COMES Appellant City of Bertram, Texas, by and through its counsel

of record, to file this Motion for Extension of Time to file Motion for Rehearing

and for en Banc Reconsideration, and Appellant would respectfully show as

follows:

I. SUMMARY Appellee Vicki Reinhardt filed suit against her former employer, Appellant

the City of Bertram, under the Texas Whistleblower Act, T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE ,

Chapter 554. The City filed a Plea to the Jurisdiction and Motion for Summary Motion for Rehearing and for en Banc Reconsideration/21256

Judgment that was denied by the Trial Court, and Appellant timely perfected this

appeal.

On August 12, 2015, a three-judge panel issued a Memorandum Opinion

upholding in part and reversing in part the decision of the Trial Court. Appellant’s

deadline to ask this Court for rehearing and for en banc reconsideration is August

27, 2015. T EX . R. A PP . P., Rule 49.1.

II. MOTION TO EXTEND TIME Appellant seeks an additional thirty days from the date of the Court’s Order

on this motion to file its motion for rehearing and reconsideration en banc. A

motion for extension of time for filing a motion for rehearing and/or motion for

reconsideration en banc may be granted by the Court of Appeals. T EX . R. A PP . P.,

Rule 49.8. Such a motion is timely as long as it is filed within fifteen days after the

last date for filing the motion. Id. Since the filing deadline for this Motion would

be today, August 27, 2015, this Motion is timely.

This is the first time that Appellant has requested an extension of time with

respect to this matter and no previous extensions of time have been granted.

Appellant asks for an order extending its deadline to thirty (30) days after

the Court’s Order granting this Motion.

Appellant seeks additional time to prepare its Motion in order to have

adequate time to appropriately and completely address for the Court the issues to

be presented for consideration. Due to scheduling conflicts, counsel for Appellant

was unable to timely prepare the Motion, as she has been largely out of the office

and out of town during the available time, in mediation and depositions and has

been preparing motions and briefing with the respect to a Travis County jury trial

set for Monday, August 31, 2015.

The issues before this Court arise from a Plea to the Jurisdiction and are

related to the preservation of the sovereign immunity of a governmental entity, of

significant importance to the jurisprudence of this State. Counsel for Appellant

seeks this extension of time to be able to prepare a Motion that will aid this Court

in its analysis and evaluation of the issues to be presented.

This request is not sought for delay but so that justice may be done.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant respectfully prays

this Court grant its Motion for Extension of Time and enter an order providing that

the filing deadline for any Motion for Rehearing and/or Motion for

Reconsideration en Banc with respect to the August 12, 2015 Order shall be 30

days from the date of the Order granting the extension, and for such and further

relief to which it may be justly entitled.

Respectfully submitted, F LETCHER , F ARLEY , S HIPMAN & S ALINAS , L.L.P. 1717 W. 6 th Street, Suite 300 Austin, Texas 78703 (512) 476-5300 FAX (512) 476-5771 By: /s/Joanna Lippman Salinas Joanna Lippman Salinas Texas State Bar No. 00791122 joanna.salinas@fletcherfarley.com Attorneys for Appellant, City of Bertram, Texas CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE I certify that I have attempted to confer with opposing counsel for Appellee

by telephone and by sending an email request for approval. I have not received a

response from counsel as of this time with respect to counsel’s position on this

Motion.

/s/ Joanna Lippman Salinas Joanna Lippman Salinas *5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Appellant’s

Motion for Extension of Time has been provided to the following via electronic

service, in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, on August 27,

2015.

Tracy D. Cluck

L AW O FFICE OF T RACY D. C LUCK

P.O. Box 855

Dripping Springs, Texas 78620

Zachary P. Hudler

Z ACHARY P. H UDLER , P.C.

P.O. Box 1728

Johnson City, Texas 78636

/s/Joanna Lippman Salinas Joanna Lippman Salinas

Case Details

Case Name: City of Bertram, Texas v. Vicki Reinhardt
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Aug 27, 2015
Docket Number: 03-14-00296-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.