33:T4d6,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"City of Baton Rouge v. Dees, 359 So. 2d 632","datePublished":"1978-06-16","legislationDate":"1978-06-16","citation":"City of Baton Rouge v. Dees, 359 So. 2d 632 (La. 1978)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Supreme Court of Louisiana","description":"Read the full text of City of Baton Rouge v. Dees (City of Baton Rouge v. Dees, 359 So. 2d 632 (La. 1978)). This legal opinion, filed in 1978-06-16, from the Supreme Court of Louisiana discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/city-of-baton-rouge-v-7491005"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/city-of-baton-rouge-v-7491005","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, City of Baton Rouge v. Dees, Supreme Court of Louisiana, City of Baton Rouge v. Dees, 359 So. 2d 632 (La. 1978)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}35:T417,

In re: Keith Dees applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus, prohibition and habe-as corpus. East Baton Rouge Parish.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable William Brown, Judge of the City Court, for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 30th day of June, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this Court, on a date to be fixed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.