No. 584 | SCOTUS | Mar 1, 1937

Per Curiam:

The motion to reinstate the appeal is granted. The appeal is dismissed (1) for the want of a substantial federal question, Carley & Hamilton v. Snook, 281 U.S. 66" date_filed="1930-02-24" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Carley & Hamilton, Inc. v. Snook Chief of the Division of Motor Vehicles">281 U. S. 66, 73-74; (2) insofar as a question is sought to be raised under the Fourteenth Amendment, for the want of a properly presented federal question. McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U.S. 432" date_filed="1908-12-21" court="SCOTUS" case_name="McCorquodale v. Texas">211 U. S. 432, 437; Forbes v. State Council of Virginia, 216 U.S. 396" date_filed="1910-02-21" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Forbes v. State Council of Va., Junior Order United American Mechanics of Va.">216 U. S. 396, 399; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U.S. 114" date_filed="1923-02-19" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.">261 U. S. 114, 117; Gelkom Realty Corp. v. Young Women’s Hebrew Assn., 296 U.S. 537" date_filed="1935-10-14" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Mississippi Central R. v. Aultman">296 U. S. 537.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.