| New York Court of Chancery | Feb 15, 1878

The Chancellor.

The bill seeks to fix and enforce the personal liability of the defendants for their misfeasance as directors of the complainants in lending without secuiity, and so in violation of one of the by-laws of the complainants, a large sum of money belonging to the complainants, which was thereby lost. The only point discussed on the argument of the demurrer was, whether the complainants have not an adequate and ready remedy at law. If it be conceded that such remedy at law exists, this court is not thereby ousted of its jurisdiction on the subject, which belongs to its ordinary and ancient jurisdiction over trusts.

Whére there has been a waste or misapplication of the funds of a corporation by the officers or agents of the corporation, a suit in equity may be brought in the name of the company to compel them to account for such waste, or misapplication, or breach of trust. Ang. & Ames on Corp., §312; Att'y-Gen. v. Utica Ins. Co., 2 Johns. Ch. 371, 389; Bayless v. Orne, Freem. Ch. 161, 173; Att'y-Gen. v. Wilson, 1 Cr. Ph. 2. The demurrer will be overruled, with costs.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.