Citimortgage, Inc. v. Phillips, 918 N.Y.S.2d 893

Citimortgage, Inc. v. Phillips

918 N.Y.S.2d 893

N.Y. App. Div.

2011

Check Treatment

Citimortgage, Inc., Respondent, v Seibert R. Phillips, Appellant, et al., Defendants. Snowflake, L.P., Nonparty Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York

918 N.Y.S.2d 893

The Supreme Court properly denied, without a hearing, the motion of the defendant Seibert R. Phillips (hereinafter the defendant), in effect, pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (4) to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. The affidavit of the plaintiff’s process server constituted prima facie evidence of valid service upon the defendant of the summons and complaint pursuant to CPLR 308 (1) (see Prospect Park Mgt., LLC v Beatty, 73 AD3d 885, 886 [2010]). In response, the defendant offered only a bare and unsubstantiated denial of service, which was insufficient to rebut the presumption of proper service (see Sturino v Nino Tripicchio & Son Landscaping, 65 AD3d 1327 [2009]; 96 Pierrepont v Mauro, 304 AD2d 631 [2003]).

Further, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the plaintiff’s alleged failure to comply with CPLR 3215 (f) did not render the judgment a nullity, or warrant excusing his default (see Araujo v Aviles, 33 AD3d 830 [2006]). Rivera, J.P., Florio, Dickerson, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.