Cipher v. GoordCipher v. Goord
Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The misbehavior report, other documentary evidence and petitioner’s admissions constitute substantial evidence to support the determination that petitioner violated inmate rule 107.20 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [8] [iii] [making false statements]; see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin,
Petitioner failed to contend in his administrative appeal that he should have been provided with a copy of an alleged letter he wrote to the Commissioner’s office and thus that contention is not properly before us (see, Matter of Nelson v Coughlin,